Mechanical and Electrical Design of Pumping Stations - 06...
Chapter - 06 : Pumping Conditions...
6-1. General...
This chapter includes the procedures used for determining
the pumping conditions. Several different pumping
conditions can occur for the same station layout due to
multiple hydrology requirements. The determination of
pumping conditions for the final station layout should be
included as part of the design documents.
6-2. Capacity Determination...
The capacity for the pumping conditions is determined
from the hydrology requirements. Generally, the stormwater
pumps in a station should have equal capacity;
however, certain other conditions such as foundation,
submergence, inflow requirements, and pump-drive
match may dictate the need for pumps of different capacity
ratings. Varying the size of the pumps may also be
required to minimize pump cycling where ponding storage
is small compared with the base flows that must be
pumped. Generally, there is a different capacity requirement
for low and high river conditions. Intermediate
conditions are possible, and also special requirements
such as siphon priming may occur. The capacity
required for a self-priming siphon discharge is that
capacity that provides a velocity of 2.2 meters per second
(7 feet per second) in the discharge pipe at the crest of
the protection. This value is conservative, and for large
stations, a model test of the siphon discharge should be
considered to determine the minimum priming velocity.
A decrease in this velocity could affect the pump selection.
Also, a siphon system that is long or contains
many dips should be model tested as the 2.2-meters-persecond
(7-feet-per-second) velocity criterion may not
prime the siphon. For stations that have a baseflow
pumping condition, a separate smaller pumping unit or
units are provided to handle the baseflow. The source
for the capacity determination should be indicated in the
design memorandum.
6-3. Head Determination...
( a ) General.
The term used to specify the amount of
lift that a pump must overcome when pumping is called
total head. Total head is composed of static head, losses
in that pumping circuit, and the velocity head developed.
All the losses in the portion of the pump that is supplied
by the pump manufacturer (generally between the suction
bell or flange and the discharge flange or the end of the elbow) are considered internal pump losses and are not
included in any head loss determination included with the
pumping equipment specification. In those cases where
the suction and discharge systems are complicated and
form an integral part of the pump, a model test to determine
the total head should be conducted by the Waterways
Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS.
( b ) Static head.
In most flood-control pumping station
applications, the static head can be considered the
difference between the pool elevation on the inside of the
protective works and the pool elevation at the discharge
point. Usually there are several different static head
requirements for a given station layout or set of hydrology
conditions. Consideration should be given to the
differences in static head caused by the variation in
pumping levels on the intake side between the project
authorized level of protection and the minimum pumping
level. The static head for satisfying the hydrology
requirements is determined from many different sump
elevations. These include the minimum pumping elevation,
the pump starting elevation, and the average sump
elevation. These elevations should be determined during
the hydraulic/hydrologic studies. The lowest stopping
elevation along with the highest elevation to be pumped
against (this elevation is determined according to the type
of discharge system being used or the maximum elevation
of the discharge pool) is used to determine the maximum
static head that will be used to select the pumping
unit. A reduction in capacity for this maximum head
condition is permitted and should be coordinated with the
H&H engineers. If the discharge is to operate as a selfpriming
siphon, the static head is the difference between
the top of the discharge pipe at its highest point and the
pump’s lowest starting level. For the priming phase of a
siphon system and for a vented nonsiphon system, it is
assumed that discharge flows by gravity past the highest
point in the discharge line, except as noted hereafter.
Discharge systems having long lengths of pipe beyond
the crest of the levee may have a head profile greater
than the top of the pipe at the top of the levee. Typical
static head conditions for various types of stations is
illustrated on Plates 2-8.
( c ) Losses.
(1) General. The losses consist of friction and other
head losses in the conveying works, before the pump
(intake losses), and after the pump discharge (discharge
losses). Intake losses include trashrack, entrance gates,
entrance piping losses, and any losses in intake channels.
Discharge losses include discharge pipes, discharge
chamber losses, and backflow preventer valves. These losses should be considered for different numbers of
pumps operating. Generally, the losses will be lowest
with one pump operating and highest with all of the
pumps in operation. For the majority of pumping stations,
the entrance losses, except the loss across the
trashrack, will be minor, and in most cases can be
neglected.
(2) External losses. These losses start at the station
forebay or sump entrance. This is usually the sewer or
ditch adjacent to the station. The losses would be from
this point to the sump where pump suction occurs. The
losses are calculated by applying “K” factors to the various
elements of flow and then multiplying them by the
velocity head occurring at that location. Based on observations
at operating stations, the losses through the trashrack
are usually assumed to be 150 millimeters
(6 inches). The other losses are those occurring on the
exit side of the pump piping and could include the losses
occurring in the discharge chamber and its piping system
to the point of termination as identified in the hydrology
report. The losses in the discharge chamber and piping
entrances, exits, and bends are calculated with “K” factors
similar to those on the entrance side. A special case
occurs in narrow discharge chambers where a critical
depth of flow may occur causing the water level in the
chamber to be higher than that occurring downstream of
the chamber. This usually occurs only for the low head
condition. Appendix E provides design information for
handling this case.
(3) Pump piping losses. These losses will include
all losses in the connecting pipes to the pump including
both the entrance and exit losses of this piping. The
Darcy-Weisbach formula should be used for determination
of piping friction losses. An explanation of the
formula and terms used is shown in Appendix E.
Methods and factors to be used in determining losses in
fittings, bends, entrance, and exits are shown in
Appendix E.
( d ) Velocity head.
The velocity head represents the
kinetic energy of a unit weight of liquid moving with
velocity V and is normally represented as the difference
of the kinetic energy of the suction and discharge piping.
However, when the pump does not have any suction piping
and is fitted with a suction bell, the velocity head is
that calculated for the discharge pipe. The velocity head
is considered a loss for free discharges and partially or
totally recovered for submerged discharges. For the
purposes of determination of system losses, and as a
safety margin, the entire velocity head will be considered
unrecoverable and thereby added to the other losses.
( e ) Total system head curves.
A total system head
curve is a curve that includes all the losses plus the static
head in the pumping circuit plotted against the pumped
capacity. The losses would include both the external and
pump piping losses plus the velocity head. A different
total system head curve occurs for each static head condition.
In determining the total system head curves, the
worst-case condition should be considered when multiple
pumps of equal rating are used. In a multi-pump station,
the piping system that has the greatest losses would be
used to determine the total system curve for the highest
head condition, while the piping system with the least
losses would be used for the lowest total system head.
For pumps discharging into a common manifold, the
highest head occurs with the maximum discharge level
and all pumps operating. The total system head curves
for the final station layout shall be submitted in whatever
design document preceeds the P&S.
6-4. Suction Requirements...
( a ) General.
The two factors to be considered are the
NPSHA, resulting from pump submergence, and the flow
conditions in the sump. Successful pump operation is
not possible without satisfying the effects of these two
influences. NPSH is defined in Chapter 5.
( b ) Submergence.
Submergence is defined as the
setting of the impeller eye of the pump with respect to
the water surface in the suction sump area. Principal
factors involved in the determination of submergence
requirements are cavitation limits and the prevention of
vortexes in the suction sump. Minimum submergence
requirements, based on estimated annual operating hours,
are provided in Appendix B. Submergence requirements,
with respect to the inlet of the pump, to prevent the
formation of vortexes in the sump are presented in ETL
1110-2-313 and Appendix B, Chart B-2. The information
provided above could yield more than one submergence
requirement. However, the most conservative
(largest) value of pump submergence should be selected.
It must also be remembered that the impeller must be
submerged at the start of pumping if the pump is to be
self-priming.
( c ) Flow conditions.
The layout of the station, the
sump water levels, and the shape of the pump intake
determine what flow paths occur in the sump. These
flow paths can cause uneven distribution into the pump,
which affects pump performance. The most observable
detriments of these are vortexes. Certain dimensions that
have been found by model testing should be used for layout of the station. These dimensions are shown in
Appendix B and are usable for all stations in which the
upstream approach in front of the station is straight for a
distance greater than five times the width of the pumping
station. Stations with a sharp bend close to the station
should be provided with a formed suction intake. The
WES Hydraulics Laboratory personnel should be consulted
concerning the station’s layout and design. WES
may be able to apply lessons learned from previous
model tests to make design or layout recommendations to
avoid possible future operational problems. However, if
an unusual entrance condition exists, a model test of the
station may be required.
6-5. Pump Requirements...
After analysis of the application is made in accordance
with Appendix B and the pump operating conditions
defined, a pump may be selected to satisfy the design
conditions. A suggested data sheet containing information
to be forwarded to pump manufacturers is shown on
Chart B-3, Appendix B. Selections may be made by the
designer from pump catalogs, but it is usually best to
confirm this selection with the manufacturers. A selection
by a minimum of two manufacturers should be
obtained. In some instances, the selection by the manufacturer
may be different enough that the station layout
may require a change. Before making these changes, an
attempt should be made to determine why the manufacturer’s
selection differs from that selected by the
designer. The designer and the pump manufacturer
should discuss the basis of the selection. Some differences,
such as the next larger sized pump or the next
faster or slower driver speed, are probably acceptable
since the pump manufacturer may not have an equivalent
to the one selected by the designer. In other cases where
the pump manufacturer recommends a different type of
pump, such as a horizontal pump where a vertical pump
was proposed, the change should be evaluated. The
studies and pump selections made in accordance with this
manual are not made to pick a specific model pump, but
to show the design, the type of pump to use for station
layout, and to provide guidance on preparing the pump
specifications and the type of pump tests to run.